| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names? |
| Date: | 2016-06-06 14:56:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYh+dfFMjuLVcMge-Q1bKLjwqkEigB7cfOf2K6WbGyeUA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>
>> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is
>> not *only* a list of names anymore.
>>
>> synchronous_standby_config?
>> synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)?
>
>
> If the existing values are still going to be accepted, then I would leave it
> as is.
+1, emphatically.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-06 15:00:52 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-06 14:55:40 | Re: Let file_fdw access COPY FROM PROGRAM |