Re: Minor typo in partition.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor typo in partition.c
Date: 2017-04-14 13:02:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYgep3Vpdzk-Vr_QeD0kGKiJk=OzWFV3U2KfmxFH_imfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Oh, just looks very different to what we discussed, so I presumed more
> changes were coming.

I waited quite a while for you to review Amit's patches on that
thread, but as you never did, I eventually picked it up.

> Where shall I mention BRIN in that chapter?

You never answered my email about why BRIN belongs in that chapter. I
maintain that it doesn't, because BRIN is not a partitioning method.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-04-14 13:05:14 Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-04-14 12:59:07 Re: Logical replication launcher uses wal_retrieve_retry_interval