Re: Remaining 9.5 open items

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
Date: 2015-12-11 15:12:46
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYeZfFE-u28JNKHV4xp6k83G4vcnYphUAbSadFV6KJZSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
>> Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > Still, I'll get a patch worked up for it and then we can discuss the
>> > merits of that patch going in to 9.5 now versus just into HEAD.
>>
>> Cool.
>
> While working on the DROP OWNED BY patch, and part of what took me a bit
> longer with it, I came to the realiziation that ALTER POLICY wasn't
> handling dependencies quite right. All of the policy's dependencies
> would be dropped, but then only those objects referred to in the ALTER
> POLICY command would have dependencies recreated for them.
>
> The attached patch fixes that (using the same approach that I used in
> the DROP OWNED BY patch).
>
> Comments welcome, as always.
>
> I'll plan to apply these two patches in a couple of days.

It's been a week?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-11 15:30:30 Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-12-11 15:11:08 Re: [HACKERS] max_worker_processes on the standby