Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
Date: 2015-04-30 16:38:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYe977Zh3iYowTSRTqWrUHR-1Dddi7Nz7C29RTzknz9xw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Attached v10 patch is latest version patch.
>>> The syntax is,
>>> REINDEX { INDEX | ... } name [ WITH ] [ VERBOSE ]
>>>
>>> That is, WITH clause is optional.
>>
>> I thought we agreed on moving this earlier in the command:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18569.1423159294@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>
>
> Oh, I see.
> Attached patch is modified syntax as
> REINDEX [VERBOSE] { INDEX | ... } name
>
> Thought?

I thought what we agreed on was:

REINDEX (flexible options) { INDEX | ... } name

The argument wasn't about whether to use flexible options, but where
in the command to put them.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-04-30 16:49:38 Re: BRIN range operator class
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2015-04-30 16:15:26 Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE