Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)
Date: 2022-11-17 17:21:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYdb2mz3NpEhohG+Th6oCmYH0o7+=Zxb6j+AZRXAN9DEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:24 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> As an experiment, I added a progress report to BufferSync()'s first loop
> (i.e. where it checks all buffers). On a 128GB shared_buffers cluster that
> increases the time for a do-nothing checkpoint from ~235ms to ~280ms. If I
> remove the changecount stuff and use a single write + write barrier, it ends
> up as 250ms. Inlining brings it down a bit further, to 247ms.

OK, I'd say that's pretty good evidence that we can't totally
disregard the issue.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2022-11-17 17:29:13 Re: SUBTRANS: Minimizing calls to SubTransSetParent()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-11-17 17:18:00 Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)