Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, MBeena Emerson <mbeena(dot)emerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."
Date: 2020-08-06 15:48:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYdXU7qYPFN-GcsqTjOehPLw=zyVUOJhDBtFKvRgTb96g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 2:11 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Okay, If you want I can remove the restriction on a toast table, but,
> then that means a user can directly remove the data chunks from the
> toast table without changing anything in the main table. This means we
> won't be able to query the main table as it will fail with an error
> like "ERROR: unexpected chunk number ...". So, we will have to find
> some way to identify the pointer to the chunks that got deleted from
> the toast table and remove that pointer from the main table. We also
> need to make sure that before we remove a tuple (pointer) from the
> main table, we identify all the remaining data chunks pointed by this
> tuple and remove them completely only then that table would be
> considered to be in a good state. Now, I am not sure if we can
> currently do all these things.

That's the user's problem. If they don't have a plan for that, they
shouldn't use this tool. I don't think we can or should try to handle
it in this code.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2020-08-06 15:57:08 Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-08-06 15:42:00 Re: pendingOps table is not cleared with fsync=off