| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Date: | 2017-02-03 23:47:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYcCCXRrZAC88C6k81fakNdmFJTgmrKiHmNW97M1s0eZw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I still haven't seen a credible model for being able to apply a stream
> of interleaved transactions that can roll back individually; I think we
> really need the ability to have multiple transactions alive in one
> backend for that.
Hmm, yeah, that's a problem. That smells like autonomous transactions.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-03 23:49:20 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-02-03 23:46:43 | Re: ParallelFinish-hook of FDW/CSP (Re: Steps inside ExecEndGather) |