Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116
Date: 2016-06-10 20:14:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYbsLOVcVQDe38g73T3NKAM6fzY3FXP3HzM1dMdNi7qtw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>>
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Robert,
>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
>> 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
>> message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
>> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
>> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your
>> efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
>
> Discussion of this issue is still ongoing. Accordingly, I intend to
> wait until that discussion has concluded before proceeding further.
> I'll check this thread again no later than Friday and send an update
> by then.

Although I have done a bit of review of this patch, it needs more
thought than I have so far had time to give it. I will update again
by Tuesday.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-06-10 20:55:24 Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-10 20:12:48 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered