Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal.
Date: 2012-05-02 16:35:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYbMv-QgQCQbmcDO57kGK1t5oT4qz9cqD77PYCoFxWQKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2 May 2012 14:43, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> "in" looks like an unnecessary duplicate, but maybe someone who speaks
>> Italian can confirm.
>
> Gabriele Bartolini, a prominent contributor to the .it translation and
> a colleague of mine, confirms privately that it's an error.

That needs to be fixed through the translations system. Otherwise,
the next update from the translations system will overwrite any change
we make in git.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-05-02 16:36:54 Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal.
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2012-05-02 16:29:32 Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal.