From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove sanity test in XRecOffIsValid. |
Date: | 2012-06-25 17:12:54 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYaQVCCQ9WXi=1o=fmkkRtne1=jSZh-G2mp_ZsEfWP1Rw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Remove sanity test in XRecOffIsValid.
>
>> Commit 061e7efb1b4c5b8a5d02122b7780531b8d5bf23d changed the rules
>> for splitting xlog records across pages, but neglected to update this
>> test. It's possible that there's some better action here than just
>> removing the test completely, but this at least appears to get some
>> of the things that are currently broken (like initdb on MacOS X)
>> working again.
>
> Offhand, I'm wondering why this macro doesn't include a MAXALIGN test.
> If it did, I don't think that the upper-limit test would have any
> use anymore.
Yeah, I wondered that, too, but wasn't sure enough about what the real
alignment requirements were to do it myself.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-25 18:00:57 | pgsql: Unbreak pg_resetxlog -l. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-25 16:35:02 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove sanity test in XRecOffIsValid. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-25 17:16:23 | Re: pg_upgrade broken by xlog numbering |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-25 17:09:38 | Re: Catalog/Metadata consistency during changeset extraction from wal |