Re: Parallel Aggregate

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregate
Date: 2016-02-13 04:51:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYaOsyDaV5sKCfPPY=H3DmdA4=vGNJC5X5uNkE7Ltd=YA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:future.
> Here I attached updated patch with the corrections.

So, what about the main patch, for parallel aggregation itself? I'm
reluctant to spend too much time massaging combine functions if we
don't have the infrastructure to use them.

This patch removes the comment from float8_regr_sxx in pg_proc.h for
no apparent reason.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-02-13 05:20:08 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-02-13 04:47:05 Re: Small PATCH: check of 2 Perl modules