Re: Refactor xlog.c #1 - startup.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactor xlog.c #1 - startup.c
Date: 2011-11-02 13:14:45
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYZkShm_sG6=4MPC50XhLZgzTXq-d1oYCnNDQtj+iwWTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Patch removes stuff related to "startup process" and creates files
> under src/$DIR/postmaster for this code.
>
> This makes startup process look more like bgwriter, walwriter etc..

In general, +1.

But I don't think we want duplicate function prototypes for the same
functions, so -1 for this hunk:

+ /* in xlog.c */
+ extern void WakeupRecovery(void);
+ extern void StartupXLOG(void);

The existing prototypes in xlog.h seem like they should be just fine.

IsPromoteTriggered could be simplified to just "return
promote_triggered;"; you don't need to branch.

I think one thing that would be worth considering in terms of future
refactoring is to split up the gigantic StartupXLOG() function in some
fashion.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-11-02 13:29:33 Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2011-11-02 12:32:23 Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?