Re: Boolean partitions syntax

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Date: 2018-01-26 16:10:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYZ3Bbqav3TTJMjrpW=hpPACvqen_SGRey2o_0NM2TkDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I've already had two people mention that it'd be neat to have PG support
> it, so I don't believe it'd go unused. As for if we should force people
> to use quotes, my vote would be no because we don't require that for
> other usage of true/false in the parser and I don't see any reason why
> this should be different.

OK. Let's wait a bit and see if anyone else wants to weigh in.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-01-26 16:31:47 Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-01-26 16:09:25 Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump