Re: checkpoint_segments upgrade recommendation?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpoint_segments upgrade recommendation?
Date: 2015-10-16 19:45:54
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYYLv+ydAivxbdgE5ZQr2C=kALkXqeUmabBnGus4dgJLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> The release notes say that checkpoint_segments has been replaced by
> max_wal_size and min_wal_size, but there is no indication on how to
> convert between the old and new settings. I think a lot of people will
> have checkpoint_segments delicately tuned, so we should at least give
> them a hint on how to carry that forward in spirit.

Yeah, it would be nice to have some guidance about that. But do we
know what the guidance should be?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Shaplov 2015-10-16 20:15:14 Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-10-16 19:42:15 Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport