| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlinking Parallel Hash Join inner batch files sooner |
| Date: | 2024-05-14 18:56:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYX4O10a4MNm6_7BfHMTJ7K0FA6ymvcaPKQ_4epykg63w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:42 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, right. I will aim to get this into the tree next week. First,
> there are a couple of minor issues to resolve around freeing that
> Heikki mentioned. Then there is the question of whether we think this
> might be a candidate for back-patching, given the complaints you
> mention. Opinions?
It doesn't appear to me that this got committed. On the procedural
question, I would personally treat it as a non-back-patchable bug fix
i.e. master-only but without regard to feature freeze. However, I can
see arguments for either treating it as a back-patchable fix or for
waiting until v18 development opens. What would you like to do?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phil Eaton | 2024-05-14 19:02:03 | Re: Add minimal C example and SQL registration example for custom table access methods. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-14 18:46:01 | Re: Add minimal C example and SQL registration example for custom table access methods. |