Re: Time to drop plpython2?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to drop plpython2?
Date: 2022-01-12 18:42:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYVmBW_K9bDLvXUQTabO1oqShjjyM_FGdMFb+mKrg64Sg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:39 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, the minimum supported version has always been the oldest version
> that actually works. I don't think we ever said, we support >= X, even
> though < X still actually works, about any dependency.

I think that we sometimes say that versions < X are unsupported if we
are unable to test whether or not they work. In other words, I think
the relevant question is whether we are able to demonstrate that it
works, not whether it actually does work.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-01-12 18:49:15 Re: Time to drop plpython2?
Previous Message Blake, Geoff 2022-01-12 18:34:12 Re: Add spin_delay() implementation for Arm in s_lock.h