Re: 64-bit queryId?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit queryId?
Date: 2017-10-20 13:44:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYUZG_9e+i-TO0FTdWmikLmH-kkEjeS=NPzUDwgxVAGRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree, and I'm perfectly fine with adding a comment around pgssHashKey.
>
> PFA a patch to warn about the danger.

Committed a somewhat different version of this - hope you are OK with
the result.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-10-20 13:49:13 Re: BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-10-20 13:23:02 Re: PATCH: enabling parallel execution for cursors explicitly (experimental)