Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Date: 2016-03-23 17:22:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYU1UR3eBi0xM_51JDHt-ivZECaHus4k_Afk+aC17L6Cw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:19 PM, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is the POSIX/C (non)-locale affected?

We don't use strxfrm() or strcoll() in that case, so I sure hope not.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sandeep Thakkar 2016-03-23 17:23:15 Re: BUG #14005: Installation Error
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-23 17:20:04 Re: Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-23 17:23:45 Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-23 17:20:04 Re: Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions