Re: [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held when calling PageGetLSN()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held when calling PageGetLSN()
Date: 2017-10-02 14:44:32
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYTNfA37J014ZQwRFx8355WC7mHF7c8g=-vUCFQHsV-=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So those bits could be considered for integration.

Yes, and they also tend to suggest that the rest of the patch has value.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-10-02 15:00:26 Re: GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-10-02 14:43:04 Re: parallelize queries containing initplans