| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Better tracking of free space during SP-GiST index build |
| Date: | 2016-09-28 17:48:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYSZS1CZfapL3x58_fT08_LK7AhyYNGspaviWmg6ro6NQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Sure, that would be useful.
>
> I think it would be useful to make repository of such data sets, so that
> patch authors & reviewers can get a reasonable collection of data sets if
> needed, instead of scrambling every time. Opinions?
In theory, great idea. In practice, I suspect the problem will be
that nobody will know what the use case for a particular data set was
supposed to be, and therefore it'll become a collection of files
nobody knows what to do with.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-09-28 17:49:59 | Re: Better tracking of free space during SP-GiST index build |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-09-28 17:46:54 | Re: less expensive pg_buffercache on big shmem |