Re: WIP: Enhanced ALTER OPERATOR

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Uriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Enhanced ALTER OPERATOR
Date: 2015-06-26 15:10:34
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYRAP8sw3Zp8_VuVnDTGDbsvkg8o=zjajd43m+70hGD3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Uriy Zhuravlev
<u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Because change the commutator and negator raised questions I suggest 3 version
> of the patch without them. In addition, for us now is much more important
> restrict and join (for "Selectivity estimation for intarray" patch).

Seems broadly sensible. You will need to write docs.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Uriy Zhuravlev 2015-06-26 15:22:53 Conflict between REL9_4_STABLE and master branch.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-26 15:05:27 Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested?