Re: 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity
Date: 2017-09-22 20:19:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYNofQ2q=R2UVqq3QjF_1iC2Nz7KtVZj-prHrYfPOS+HQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It turns out it is not new in pg10. I spotted in the log file only by
> accident while looking for something else. Now that I am looking for it, I
> do see it in 9.6 as well.

So I guess the next question is whether it also shows up if you initdb
with 9.4.latest and then run the same test.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2017-09-22 20:23:53 Re: [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-09-22 19:58:42 Re: [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering