| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: GiST support for inet datatypes |
| Date: | 2014-04-08 19:56:52 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYNMVbiK1tV_R5FuTpzwKGeS6ja5X88pc+LcSDyWFrtqg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> [ inet-gist-v6.patch ]
>
> Committed with some additional documentation work. Thanks for
> submitting this!
NICE. I'd like to tell you how excited I am about this part:
# It also handles a new network
# operator inet && inet (overlaps, a/k/a "is supernet or subnet of"),
# which is expected to be useful in exclusion constraints.
...but I can't, because my mouth is too full of drool. Wouldn't you
really want that more for cidr than for inet, though?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-08 20:02:48 | Re: GiST support for inet datatypes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-08 19:51:54 | Re: GiST support for inet datatypes |