| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Surafel Temsgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New CORRESPONDING clause design |
| Date: | 2017-02-19 16:43:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYMgtcJnoVhE73vGkX_1Hyqj06FcXZ-xocdhth=LJn-Hg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Surafel Temsgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is the implementation of the clause with the slight change, instead of
> doing column mapping for each side of leaf Queries in planner I make the
> projection nodes output to corresponding column lists only.
>
> This patch compiles and tests successfully with master branch on
> ubuntu-15.10-desktop-amd64.It also includes documentation and new regression
> tests in union.sql.
You should probably add this to https://commitfest.postgresql.org/ so
that it doesn't get forgotten about.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-19 16:58:54 | Re: case_preservation_and_insensitivity = on |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-19 16:41:13 | Re: Passing query string to workers |