Re: fun with "Ready for Committer" patches

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fun with "Ready for Committer" patches
Date: 2016-03-09 12:47:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYMZDQ8L+2+aY58JQAaWZYBKOGvQ1o0auQvkfg302Osbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> It's hard to miss the fact that there are an absolutely breathtaking
>> number of patches in this CommitFest - 80! - that are in the "needs
>> review" state. We really, really, really need more review to happen -
>
> Many of "needs review" state patches already have reviewer(s). Do you
> mean we want more reviewers in addition to them for such patches?

Well, what we mostly need is more *reviews*. Whether those are from
the reviewers already signed up or new reviewers is, IMHO, a secondary
consideration.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-09 12:47:35 Re: fun with "Ready for Committer" patches
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2016-03-09 12:40:00 Re: WAL log only necessary part of 2PC GID