Re: GUCs to control abbreviated sort keys

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUCs to control abbreviated sort keys
Date: 2023-01-25 02:42:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYLLhHf74XMYfTutQcN9Gf5hE40QOpH2H15wHK+bTLPuQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:16 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> This is fairly simple, so I plan to commit soon.

I find it a bit premature to include this comment in the very first
email.... what if other people don't like the idea?

I would like to hear about the cases where abbreviated keys resulted
in a regression.

I'd also like to know whether there's a realistic possibility that
making this a run-time test could itself result in a regression.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-01-25 03:26:24 Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-01-25 02:32:46 Re: plpython vs _POSIX_C_SOURCE