Re: Pushdown target list below gather node (WAS Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pushdown target list below gather node (WAS Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification)
Date: 2016-03-16 17:27:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYKkA3wh+si8ORZstJWOFz5KyvT4TqMpR0ec46tOcc3yQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yeah, I was thinking about the same thing. The comment block above
> where you're looking would need some adjustment.

OK, how about this?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
parallel-tlist-pushdown-v2.patch text/x-diff 3.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-16 17:29:22 Re: POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-16 17:24:16 Re: [PATCH] Integer overflow in timestamp[tz]_part() and date/time boundaries check