Re: Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition
Date: 2017-06-13 15:53:55
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYKjqFPrLZxyPDE5SAb38SXv+=+_KSqN4HsUECi0Oipqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have added tests to the
> 0001-Dependency-between-partitioned-table-and-partition_v1.patch. Please
> find attached the v2 patch.

Thanks. Committed. I don't think the 0002 patch is an improvement -
sure, it keeps those things in sync, but it also makes the code harder
to read. On balance I think it's a negative.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-06-13 15:55:44 Re: RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-06-13 15:53:09 Re: RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments