| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
| Date: | 2020-08-26 17:55:26 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYKRHD3_4F5Pcr-bzRukaUrG__SBRXEkiFCF_saMYPmAw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:57 AM Mark Dilger
<mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I wonder if we can get more comments for or against this patch, at least in principle, in the very near future, to help determine whether the deprecation notices should go into v13?
Speaking of that, has somebody written a specific patch for that?
Like, exactly what are we proposing that this deprecation warning is
going to say?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-08-26 18:09:50 | Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2020-08-26 17:52:17 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |