Re: posix_fadvise missing in the walsender

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: posix_fadvise missing in the walsender
Date: 2013-02-21 11:27:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYHni6S36HnH4Qrw7yYhD8U5b4VQgrHPfNTi_H7MnTGyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> wrote:
> So given the above, I think it's possible to come up with benchmarks
> that prove whatever you want to prove :-)

Yeah. :-(

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-02-21 13:05:29 Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-02-21 10:30:27 Re: FDW for PostgreSQL