Re: A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()
Date: 2017-09-14 15:26:34
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYHKJeaRNtK-43ZWcnWzN1R5QF5vE+NBddpYjDw5T1jMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Since Jeevan Ladhe mentioned this patch [1] earlier this week, sending the
> rebased patches here for consideration. Actually there are only 2 patches
> now, because 0002 above is rendered unnecessary by ecfe59e50fb [2].

Committed 0001 and back-patched to v10.

Your 0002 and the patch from Jeevan Ladhe to which you refer seem to
be covering closely related subjects. When I apply either patch by
itself, the regression tests pass; when I apply both together, they
fail. Could you and Jeevan sort that out?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-09-14 15:28:47 Re: Is it time to kill support for very old servers?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-14 15:23:14 Re: Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requested and not yet present