Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Cynthia Shang <cynthia(dot)shang(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Date: 2017-01-26 19:28:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYH5gnTq6Qsx1qWmKqa3A7OFt5S_BSQ6BxDQazLVLnb4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Whether the voters recognized that fact at the time I would have to concur
>> that if we are going to change from xlog to wal we should be all-in. If
>> you want to vote to reject putting the whole camel in the tent I would say
>> its a vote for reverting the change that put the camel's nose in there in
>> the first place.
>
> WTF.

I think that response is unwarranted. I happen to agree entirely with
his position.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-01-26 19:34:17 Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-26 19:26:36 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal