Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marc-Olaf Jaschke <marc-olaf(dot)jaschke(at)s24(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Date: 2016-03-23 20:07:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYGk-K_btP78Zh1=u7TSbEd1D=mjkLRZD-jVLWEk_LPAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> +#ifndef TRUST_STRXFRM
>> + if (!collate_c)
>> + abbreviate = false;
>> +#endif
>
> Ah, I did not realize that abbreviation would be of any value in C locale.
> If it is, then +1 for something like the above.

It's actually more likely to help for a C locale than for a non-C locale.

I have committed this and back-patched it to 9.5.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-23 21:34:33 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-23 19:20:17 Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2016-03-23 20:08:32 Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2016-03-23 20:01:05 Re: Relation extension scalability