From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sanity checking for ./configure options? |
Date: | 2016-03-11 13:23:48 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYGP09fs4gGGyvXGcbx8_ErXE1Op2vvCjsDh22O3uJWiQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/26/16 9:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> To make this really robust, you might need to do pattern matching on the
>> value.
>
> Yeah, and I don't see any reasonable way to do that... we don't require sed
> or the like, do we?
>
> I'll look at the other things you mentioned.
Jim, if you want this in 9.6, we need an update, like, RSN.
Otherwise, I'm going to mark it Returned with Feedback, and you can
resubmit for 9.7.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-11 13:26:37 | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
Previous Message | Gilles Darold | 2016-03-11 13:16:49 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |