Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date: 2019-03-22 18:31:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYFcuCV-dFofAdgLZqj-3nha7pKBcFdQuZCODrV31qgcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:47 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> how close you were getting to rewriting the entire heap. This is the
> one thing I found but did not fix; any chance you could make this
> change and update the documentation to match?

Hi, is anybody working on this?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-03-22 18:33:05 Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Previous Message Sergey Cherkashin 2019-03-22 18:29:09 Re: Psql patch to show access methods info