Re: injection_points: Switch wait/wakeup to use atomics rather than latches

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: injection_points: Switch wait/wakeup to use atomics rather than latches
Date: 2026-05-29 12:48:58
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYE-9WhM-owWtX3grbSeHtOJCF__wEEdoD-jj-oJ+=TSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 7:19 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 08:40:39AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > After reading this email, the linked-to email, and the commit message
> > for the patch, I still don't have a clear understanding of what this
> > is intended to fix. It seems like it's going to make the
> > responsiveness worse. In general, we want to replace escalating wait
> > loops with things that wake up instantly at the right time, and this
> > is going in the opposite direction.
>
> This is an exchange between responsiveness of the system and
> flexibility. I have had two complaints in the past about the fact
> that the waits and wakeups were not doable due to the fact that we
> rely on condition variables and latches:

I'm still struggling to understand. Condition variables and latches
are both designed to allow for nice waits and wakeups.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2026-05-29 12:51:23 Re: Key joins
Previous Message Jakob Egger 2026-05-29 12:26:59 glob support in extension_control_path/dynamic_library_path?