Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2017-01-18 20:29:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYDta7SZQTKq6AXdQtM=eHrsLTbfX-T4P=wbV2TVu5fzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> [ updated patches ]
>
> I committed 0004 and also fixed the related regression test not to
> rely on DROP .. CASCADE, which isn't always stable. The remainder of
> this patch set needs a rebase, and perhaps you could also fold in
> other pending partitioning fixes so I have everything to look at it in
> one place.

Just to be a little more clear, I don't mind multiple threads each
with a patch or patch set so much, but multiple patch sets on the same
thread gets hard for me to track. Sorry for the inconvenience.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-18 20:37:23 Re: Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctl start without --wait
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-18 20:25:46 Re: Declarative partitioning vs. BulkInsertState