From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table |
Date: | 2017-08-02 17:53:05 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYDrL1UdrAiYnwWKi3XoUVi_N=Z0CSoaKDx1SE1t+AbPQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The patch itself looks just fine on a quick glance, modulo the lack of
>> documentation, but I think we need to bikeshed the name of the flag.
>> --reload-through-root is clear as daylight to me, but I'm not sure
>> users will agree. The lack of the word "partition" is perhaps a
>> significant flaw, and pg_dump doesn't really reload anything; it just
>> dumps.
>
>> The best thing I can come up with after brief thought is
>> --partition-data-via-root, but maybe somebody else has a better idea?
>
> --restore-via-partition-root ?
I worry someone will think that pg_dump is now restoring stuff, but it isn't.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-08-02 17:53:51 | Re: Macros bundling RELKIND_* conditions |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-08-02 17:45:37 | Re: Macros bundling RELKIND_* conditions |