Re: Minor improvements in alter_table.sgml

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor improvements in alter_table.sgml
Date: 2014-04-14 14:53:57
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYDn1oSh=pqNZnakXPTD6Lk+jysazpwVs2CHgBnuU6ehg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Attached is an updated version of the patch.

I applied the first two hunks of this, which seem like clear
oversights; and also the bit fixing the constraint_name language.

I think the other changes deserve to be considered separately, and in
particular I'm still not sure it's a good idea to document both OF
type_name and type_name.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-04-14 14:56:20 Re: Signaling of waiting for a cleanup lock?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-04-14 14:50:05 Re: Signaling of waiting for a cleanup lock?