| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: archive modules |
| Date: | 2022-02-03 21:15:30 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYDiOPrEAwzf4MAp-RPRo4TgU1MHfuDOBz-FupWfDa74A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:11 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:04:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal,
> > or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not
> > sure what the existing precedents are, if any.
>
> The only precedent I've found so far is test_decoding, which sets wal_level
> to "logical." Perhaps we can just set it to "replica" in
> basic_archive.conf.
Yeah, that seems to make sense.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2022-02-03 21:18:27 | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-02-03 21:11:21 | Re: archive modules |