Re: Parallel query and temp_file_limit

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel query and temp_file_limit
Date: 2016-06-07 15:32:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYCwVdVbXYSjW8L7=BZi1JSxcUt0ZXtwXqisBji5tcXzw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think for 9.6 we just have to document this issue. In the next
>>> release, we could (and might well want to) try to do something more
>>> clever.
>>
>> Works for me. You may wish to update comments within fd.c at the same time.
>
> I've created a 9.6 open issue for this.

You previously offered to write a patch for this. Are you still
planning to do that?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-06-07 15:40:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-06-07 15:16:51 Re: Problem with dumping bloom extension