Re: beta3?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: beta3?
Date: 2011-07-05 13:56:34
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYBW-atpRiAueigUpbK07WReFJUN73_jOi3U=xZ_8ODmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> That sounds reasonable to me.  I'll be on vacation then, but (1) I'm
>> not really involved in pushing the release out the door and (2) I
>> should have Internet access if push comes to shove.
>
> We seem to still have some blockers ...

I'm only seeing these two:

* ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
* btree_gist breaks some behaviors involving <> operators

Simon fixed the first over the weekend (though I think there are a few
loose ends, see separate email on that topic) and Tom proposed a fix
for the second (which I am guessing he will implement).

Any other reason we can't or shouldn't wrap on the 11th?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

  • Re: beta3? at 2011-07-01 22:06:06 from Josh Berkus

Responses

  • Re: beta3? at 2011-07-05 17:14:20 from Kevin Grittner

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-07-05 14:00:49 Re: Small documentation issue
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-07-05 13:24:31 Re: Crash dumps