Re: Avoid index rebuilds for no-rewrite ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Avoid index rebuilds for no-rewrite ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE
Date: 2011-07-07 19:25:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYBQ1L70hEVd2N5xyM=2On_1C-eN_LRWjXZyKBz6PzcCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:06:46PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > CheckIndexCompatible() calls ComputeIndexAttrs() to resolve the new operator
>> > classes, collations and exclusion operators for each index column.  It then
>> > checks those against the existing values for the same.  I figured that was
>> > obvious enough, but do you want a new version noting that?
>>
>> I guess one question I had was... are we depending on the fact that
>> ComputeIndexAttrs() performs a bunch of internal sanity checks?  Or
>> are we just expecting those to always pass, and we're going to examine
>> the outputs after the fact?
>
> Those checks can fail; consider an explicit operator class or collation that
> does not support the destination type.  At that stage, we neither rely on those
> checks nor mind if they do fire.  If we somehow miss the problem at that stage,
> DefineIndex() will detect it later.  Likewise, if we hit an error in
> CheckIndexCompatible(), we would also hit it later in DefineIndex().

OK.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-07-07 19:53:18 Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-07-07 19:21:39 Re: Avoid index rebuilds for no-rewrite ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE