Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll
Date: 2013-06-27 14:37:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYAxG8vgp7iH-jvJeFUTzi5Crc9uEaPBbSv+Pi_gaDwsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> I'd like to see prizes each release for "best contribution" and "best
> reviewer" - I've thought for years something like this would be worth
> trying. Committers and core members should not be eligible - this is about
> encouraging new people.

Encouraging new people is good, but recognizing sustained, long-term
contributions is good, too. I think we should do more of that, too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-06-27 14:40:36 Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-06-27 14:33:44 Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)