Re: pgbench -i order of vacuum

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench -i order of vacuum
Date: 2012-07-23 18:45:01
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY9vva2xiRtC4ovpjQ8DNiyCaZOGd9rtH-dGHG6n5vrhw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
>>> The command it executes is "vacuum analyze ..", so it will do analyze also
>>> on table which means
>>> it will collect stats corresponding to table and index.
>
>> Are there stats collected on indexes?
>
> Only for expression indexes, which there aren't any of in the standard
> pgbench scenario. I don't see a reason not to change the ordering
> as you suggest.

OK, done.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-07-23 18:45:22 Re: postgres 9 bind address for replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-07-23 18:43:34 Re: BUG #6748: sequence value may be conflict in some cases