| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory |
| Date: | 2015-02-15 23:47:41 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY976=dOO62Edi14c22-LHOVmQ0Np6ZLEcT4F-by_2MRQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm going to stick this into the commitfest even though it's not really
> close to being committable; I see some other people doing likewise with
> their pet patches ;-). What it could particularly do with some reviewing
> help on is exploring the performance changes it creates; what cases does
> it make substantially worse?
It's perfectly reasonable to add stuff that isn't committable yet to
the CF app; the point of the CF app is to track what needs reviewing.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2015-02-15 23:50:37 | Re: Really bad blowups with hash outer join and nulls |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-15 23:41:47 | Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory |