Re: logical-replication.sgml improvements

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical-replication.sgml improvements
Date: 2017-01-24 16:29:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY8EzTh4mErKsyQ5tX__DVP4DydaGRR-r7dSd_D7ONQfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> logical-replication.sgml.diff changes

I had a look at this but these are not all open-and-shut cases. In
many cases I think your proposed wording is better, but it's probably
a good idea for the people who were involved in the development of the
logical replication feature to have a look at it just to see if there
is anything with which they'd like to disagree.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2017-01-24 16:30:58 Re: Checksums by default?
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2017-01-24 16:26:08 Re: Deadlock in XLogInsert at AIX