| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API |
| Date: | 2014-08-26 20:09:28 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY7_4diqhQQmE6+9ZtubMsgRSTxsO4fmPq0Jk586hVvnQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> One thing I was pointed out, it is the reason why I implemented
> DDL support, is that intermediation of c-language function also
> loads the extension module implicitly. It is an advantage, but
> not sure whether it shall be supported from the beginning.
That is definitely an advantage of the DDL-based approach, but I think
it's too much extra machinery for not enough real advantage. Sounds
like we all agree, so ...
> I'd like to follow this direction, and start stripping the DDL support.
...please make it so.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2014-08-26 20:12:07 | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-08-26 20:09:00 | Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization) |