Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL
Date: 2014-12-15 16:24:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY5S4km4+MQzgSnZnETAJVoX1uO7w5i9aCYzNVtB=RLLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm not sure about the rest of this but...

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> Is this patch
> worthwhile even without reducing the lock levels of the drop commands?

Yes! It certainly makes more sense to reduce the lock levels where we
can do that relatively easily, and postpone work on related projects
that are harder, rather than waiting until it all seems to work before
doing anything at all.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-12-15 16:28:03 Re: Commitfest problems
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-12-15 16:22:10 Re: Join push-down support for foreign tables