From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: single-user vs standalone in docs and messages |
Date: | 2013-06-14 22:30:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY54kjDOVVZ25Oh8WO8xmqnT-mKzW2tyMDB51o1w0S3eQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Some places in the docs and elog hints refer to "standalone" backends, while
> the official name as used in app-postgres.html is "single-user mode", and in
> fact "standalone" does not appear on that page.
>
> This tries to standardize the other locations to use "single-user". I think
> I did the right thing with the message translation files, but I can't figure
> out how to test that.
>
> I made no attempt to change code-comments, just the user-facing parts.
I think you could tell people to use "single-user mode" instead of "a
standalone backend", but telling them to use "a single-user backend"
just seems weird.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Poole | 2013-06-14 22:42:25 | stray SIGALRM |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-06-14 22:28:06 | [RFC] Minmax indexes |